jump to navigation

Conditional Clauses July 7, 2013

Posted by Ronica Stromberg in Uncategorized.
Tags: , ,
trackback

A writer in one of my critique groups asked me recently about conditional clauses. These clauses are found in sentences beginning with if. The other writer questioned why I had written a sentence beginning with “If I were you . . .” instead of “If I was you . . .”

Were is the correct form of the verb to use with I in if (conditional) sentences when the condition suggested is impossible or highly improbable. I could never be another person, so the conditional clause “If I was you . . . ” is wrong. I need to use were to communicate that I’m talking about a supposition or condition that can never be.

Many writers have lost this distinction in their writing or never realized there are times they should be using were instead of was in conditional clauses. I’ve written a few more sentences below to better show the distinction.

Example #1:

Right:  “If I were dead, I wouldn’t care about my belongings.”

Wrong:  “If I was dead, I wouldn’t care about my belongings.” (This conditional clause with was is not possible because the speaker is talking and obviously alive. Were is the correct word to use in clauses like this that are describing impossible situations.)

Example #2 (both sentences are correct and being spoken by a 70-year-old man):

Right:  “At that time, if I was 16, I could have worked as a car hop.” (At the point in history the 70-year-old is referring to, it would have been possible for him to work as a car hop if he was 16. Was is the correct word to use in conditional clauses like this that are possible.)

Right:  “If I were 16 now, I’d love to be a high school exchange student.” (The 70-year-old man isn’t 16 now, so this clause is impossible. Were is the correct word to use in conditional clauses like this that are impossible.)

Example #3:

Right:  If I was certified (at that time), I could have done that work.

Right:  If I were certified (but I’m not), I could do that work.

About these ads

Comments»

1. vakantieparken in frankrijk - July 7, 2013

I do agree with all of the concepts you have presented for your post.
They are really convincing and will certainly work.
Still, the posts are too brief for starters. Could you please
prolong them a bit from next time? Thanks for the post.

2. Home Improvement Catalog - July 10, 2013

I enjoy reading a post that will make people think. Also,
thanks for allowing for me to comment!

3. Ronica Stromberg - July 11, 2013

For further examples of these types of clauses, check out The Gregg Reference Manual. It is one of my favorite books for giving straight-forward explanations and advice on grammar rules.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 29 other followers

%d bloggers like this: